Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-05-17 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-05-17 Senate Journal Page 1343 SB 55 The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 55(RLS) Shall the Senate Concur in the House Amendment to CSSB 55(FIN)? Effective Date YEAS: 17 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Bishop, Coghill, Costello, Dunleavy, Egan, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Hughes, Kelly, MacKinnon, Meyer, Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Wilson Excused: Begich, Wielechowski Absent: von Imhof and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 55(RLS) "An Act relating to criminal law and procedure; relating to controlled substances; relating to sentencing; relating to protective orders; relating to restitution; relating to the period of probation; relating to revocation, termination, suspension, cancellation, or restoration of a driver's license; relating to parole; relating to the duties of the Department of Corrections and the Department of Health and Social Services; requiring an inventory of and reports on untested sexual assault examination kits; and providing for an effective date." Senator Micciche moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered. The Secretary was requested to notify the House. The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment.